Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
VexXx Dogg wrote:Les Bain wrote:What's the legal loophole preventing our authorities from reaching out to our 1st world allies' relevant departments for an assist where DNA and forensics is involved?
Doubt it's a legal loophole, but more of a $$$$$$$$$$ constraint
88sins wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Les Bain wrote:What's the legal loophole preventing our authorities from reaching out to our 1st world allies' relevant departments for an assist where DNA and forensics is involved?
Doubt it's a legal loophole, but more of a $$$$$$$$$$ constraint
It ain't about the money.
maj. tom wrote:DNA confirmed it is Hannah Matura but they still need to link it to the suspect. No witness. Come there must be forensic evidence of the murder, dig deeper investigators.
What did the pathologist determine as cause of death anyway? I just read that they said it was unnatural.
redmanjp wrote:CNC3: DNA results confirm remains are in fact Hannah Mathura.
DNA test confirms Hannah’s remains
... but DPP orders cops to continue investigating
More than a month after human remains were found in the backyard of her family home in Valsayn, DNA testing has confirmed that the bones were, in fact, those of 18-year-old Hannah Mathura.
However, there are still some critical gaps in the police’s investigation into the matter which may prevent any charges from being laid for now.
Police sources said yesterday that investigators received the results of the DNA test sometime between Wednesday and Thursday last week and approached Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Roger Gaspard on Friday for advice in the ongoing matter.
However, sources said detectives were told to continue working on establishing more facts surrounding Mathura’s death and securing possible evidence.
Earlier reports which suggested the bones were believed to be those of a man were thus ruled as false readings.
The tests were done on the bone marrow and biological tissue-like cartilage remaining from decomposed skeletal remains. Samples from Hanna’s siblings were used to verify her family lineage.
Earlier this month, the remains were taken to the Port-of- Spain General Hospital for X-Ray analysis to determine the density and structure of the bones.
The remains, one source said, were also in a tube top, a pair of underwear and red pants.
According to details of the matter thus far, one of Mathura’s relatives told police that she was killed and buried in the backyard in June 2017.
One source close to the case said one challenge in investigating Mathura’s death was the length of time between her burial and the discovery of her remains.
He noted that material evidence, like a possible murder weapon, a shovel used in the burial or other items, were not available to the investigating officers.
“When you consider the absence of these items and the fact that the body would have been there for seven years with the area exposed to the elements... it’s a difficult matter to probe,” the source said.
Mathura’s parents were arrested shortly after her remains were found but later released pending further enquiries.
Mathura’s siblings have since sought legal representation and have cooperated with police in the enquiry.
Contacted for comment yesterday, Sanjiv Boodhu, one of the attorneys representing the Mathura siblings, said he was not aware of the latest development and did not have any instructions from his clients.
Boodhu added that he may receive information from the police today and would not be able to advise his clients until he received direct confirmation from officers.
Boodhu and Sasha Paula Singh are representing the Mathura siblings.
Correct is rightpugboy wrote:so this going nowhere fast then
Hannah's family learned of DNA results from media
https://newsday.co.tt/2024/04/23/hannahs-family-learned-of-dna-results-from-media/
Lawyer for the Mathura siblings, Sanjiv Boodhu told Newsday they woke up to the news of the DNA results in the newspaper.
He said no-one from the TTPS had contacted them and any information they had gained was done through the media.
pugboy wrote:eventually them siblings will spill the beans
Dizzy28 wrote:pugboy wrote:eventually them siblings will spill the beans
My SiL is in the same year and some of the same classes as the brother who was running for UWI Guild President recently. Based on what she tells us he told them about this and to see them tell the public something else is pretty vexing.
Dizzy28 wrote:pugboy wrote:eventually them siblings will spill the beans
My SiL is in the same year and some of the same classes as the brother who was running for UWI Guild President recently. Based on what she tells us he told them about this and to see them tell the public something else is pretty vexing.
Dizzy28 wrote:pugboy wrote:eventually them siblings will spill the beans
My SiL is in the same year and some of the same classes as the brother who was running for UWI Guild President recently. Based on what she tells us he told them about this and to see them tell the public something else is pretty vexing.
X2pugboy wrote:what’s the summary?
Is this JOSTISS?hover11 wrote:UPDATE
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: st7 and 108 guests