Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
daas wrote:On the point of deficits being a trend of developed countries
While deficits carry a negative connotation, in the overall scheme of things it can actually be a good thing.
BRZ wrote:If there is a devaluation coming this Budget day - Expect prices of everything Imported or with Foreign Input to Increase accordingly.
For a Long time now there has been a lack of Encouragement to "BUY LOCAL", lets see if it will come back to bite people in the rear.
Hope you all ready - Tiida new price might be $300,000.00
The_Honourable wrote:BRZ wrote:If there is a devaluation coming this Budget day - Expect prices of everything Imported or with Foreign Input to Increase accordingly.
For a Long time now there has been a lack of Encouragement to "BUY LOCAL", lets see if it will come back to bite people in the rear.
Hope you all ready - Tiida new price might be $300,000.00
Governments do currency devaluations when the population least expects it. Since people looking out for it on budget day, it would not happen.
btw, found this nice piece of history:
In 1964 the Trinidad and Tobago dollar replaced the British West Indian dollar as the national currency. Eastern Caribbean dollars--the common currency of members of the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS--see Glossary) and pegged to the United States dollar at EC$2.70 equals US$1.00--and other currencies also circulated. From 1972 to 1976, the Trinidad and Tobago dollar was floated against the British pound sterling; after 1976, however, the Trinidad and Tobago dollar was pegged to the United States dollar. The first major depreciation of the Trinidad and Tobago dollar since June 1976 occurred in December 1985, when the country's currency was devalued 50 percent against the United States dollar. As a result of the devaluation, the exchange rate moved from US$1.00 to TT$2.40 to US$1.00 to TT$3.60. This reduced international reserves but was expected to increase export competitiveness. Government foreign exchange controls existed, particularly for foreign travel by nationals.
Source: http://countrystudies.us/caribbean-islands/50.htm
BRZ wrote:
![]()
like you already forget about Who's the Min of Finance, shurrt meng does do everything out ah time
daxt0r wrote:i get blank about 3 days now for a lil $15000 USD, bank manager saying that the central bank not issuing foreign exchange or something
~Vēġó~ wrote:bye bye on-line shopping.....ent dais what local businesses want?
janfar wrote:~Vēġó~ wrote:bye bye on-line shopping.....ent dais what local businesses want?
Nobody reading the play yet.
bluesclues wrote:@miktay
the answer to your question is simple.
with china keeping their currency artificially undervalued, it allows them to take a major market share of the internation export market. and usa buys everything from china and then we come and buy from usa.
bluesclues wrote:im not accusing china of anything. it's known that they keep their rate artificially low. they just lowered it again about 3 weeks ago. that allows them to print more money into circulation without debt. and is also part of how they capture the international export market with cheap goods.
bluesclues wrote:forcibly lower than it could be whilst still maintaining a viable economy. its a pretty neat trick when u look at it. just have to have the productivity to keep the drive going and that economy will eventually explode. some ancient financial wisdom them chinese on.
Miktay wrote:bluesclues wrote:forcibly lower than it could be whilst still maintaining a viable economy. its a pretty neat trick when u look at it. just have to have the productivity to keep the drive going and that economy will eventually explode. some ancient financial wisdom them chinese on.
Again.
Every major country does this.
Why is it artificial when China does it? Why iz it NOT artificial when the US does it?
China iz just playing the game.
Don't hate the playa...hate the game.
yes but its not quite the same. china has trillions in 'savings'. while other countries are deficit spending and taking loans. usa as an example borrowed trillions from china and still owing. when you consider these factors u realise that the yuan can suffer a great loss of resilience if its value were to say double. but their economy would function, just like all our deficit economies are.
but why would you do that, when you can have all the countries of the world standing on your backbone? protected by the tents of shem.
Miktay wrote:yes but its not quite the same. china has trillions in 'savings'. while other countries are deficit spending and taking loans. usa as an example borrowed trillions from china and still owing. when you consider these factors u realise that the yuan can suffer a great loss of resilience if its value were to say double. but their economy would function, just like all our deficit economies are.
So it's NOT OK for creditor nations to manipulate their currency?
But thats OK for debtor nations?
That makes no sense.but why would you do that, when you can have all the countries of the world standing on your backbone? protected by the tents of shem.
Yuh loss mih there...pardner.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 43 guests